User talk:WMrapids
Add topic
|
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 18:14, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aerial view of Mackinac Island 2020-09-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Re: Questions
[edit]Hi. I currently have a DJI Air 3S, but this is my third drone, I started with a Mini 4 Pro, then I had an Air 3. If you have a Mini 3 you can take decent quality photos with it, provided they are taken in raw files and then converted well to jpg files. I use Adobe Photoshop and Camera Raw for this. Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:44, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I've been experimenting with Adobe Lightroom recently and noticed that I need to focus on my shutter speed, I believe. I'm always appreciative of advice, especially from someone with a talent like yours. WMrapids (talk) 19:11, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Grande Vitesse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 29 July 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! City museum - Zeeland, Michigan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 August 2025 (UTC)
copyright problem
[edit]Sorry to meet you under these circumstances, but we must comply with international copyright law. We are not allowed to publish Calders' works for a long time... This image must be deleted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:20, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation and sharing sympathy in your message. I provided my own comment on the file as I've always done my best to abide by copyright regulations. WMrapids (talk) 06:48, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:La Grande Vitesse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
[edit]Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Columbia Center.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridgewater Place complex (view of exterior from east).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:19, 5 September 2025 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial photographs of Windsor, Ontario - view front the northwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:22, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Valued Image Promoted
[edit]Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Fort Michilimackinac - aerial view from the southwest.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
FP Promotion
[edit]★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Columbia Center.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Columbia Center.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:RiverTown Crossings logo (1999).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |