User talk:DoctorWhoFan91

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, DoctorWhoFan91!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 05:28, 23 August 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Abzeronow (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Possible answer

Dear DoctorWhoFan91, Thanks for your question. As I don't know much about your interests (apart from chess), I thought I might best give you a list of interesting image collections in Commons. Mr.Nostalgic is a prolific uploader to Commons (>1M), but isn't very much occupied with adding categories. You might find a lot of files that could use categories or files needing more specific descriptions in this list. --- Vysotsky (talk) 10:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Thank you, very helpful! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:52, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Unidentified maps

Could you please invest a little bit more time, when your're working on this category. Chucking everything into the national top level category is a bit underwhelming. Try to have an eye on map themes as well. We've got a lot of very differentiated map categories, please use them. Hinnerk11 (talk) 00:26, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm planning on doing that later- I actually do put more effort when the subcategory is obvious enough. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I wish I could believe that. You added "Maps of Korea" instead "Maps of Gyeongbokgung" to the file "Keihukugu 1946.png" just 7 minutes later. Why not do it correctly right away? The name of the place is in the file description.

Yes, so that me or someone else could put even more categories on it. The description is not always correct. And as for "Why not do it correctly right away"- why don't you do it right away, instead of adding "Unidentified maps" as cat? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:19, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

I add "Unidentified maps" to all the unsorted map files I find in the category "All media needing categories as of 2025" with cat-a-lot. This makes it easier to notice groups of maps that can later be moved in bulk to the correct categories. The description is not always correct? Weird reasoning, just look at the map, it tells you the place, that's their sole reason of existence. --Hinnerk11 (talk) 00:23, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Mass "categorization"

Can you explain [1]? It's nowhere near Europe.

(Besides, Category:Unidentified locations in Europe is only very marginally more useful than no category at all.) -- Gauss (talk) 08:09, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Must have slipped through- I checked like 10-20% of the categorised images.

It is more useful bcs a specific category is more likely to be seen by people(I had just categorised a few dozen files from there to their specific countries)- I myself was gonna go through it in a few days time; also, the location are given for all of said images, so it just needs a pair of hands. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 08:32, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

Miss you!

Was randomly visiting perm pages & saw your request there. It's good to see that you haven't left all of the Wikimedia projects .We really miss you on English Wikipedia. Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs^⚔ 17:37, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Thank you! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:57, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller!

---

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi DoctorWhoFan91,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

Bedivere (talk) 05:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello

Hello friend! Are you interested in requesting file rename for Category:Parahucho perryi? I'm glad to know you at Commons:Categories for discussion/2025/04/Category:Leopardus guttulus in Parc des Félins. Good luck! Henrydat (talk) 09:56, 30 June 2025 (UTC)

What do you think it should be renamed to? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 12:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

I merged 2 categories. I mean files in category should be renamed. Henrydat (talk) 20:07, 2 July 2025 (UTC)

There are a lot of files, so I think it should be fine to keep as is, as the names are common synonyms. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:49, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

You right. But one of them was renamed File:Parahucho perryi juvenile.jpg. Maybe for use of it on other wiki. I will consider them. I had a suggestion rejected, I think you will have better luck. I hope to see you often at cfd. It looks like you are less active. Henrydat (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

Hmm, I'll see when I get the time. Yeah, I haven't been active at cfd much- bcs basically nothing that takes more than a quick yes or no is there for most/all categories. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:59, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

I'm closing them, it doesn't sound right. Henrydat (talk) 19:06, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi DoctorWhoFan91, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Abzeronow (talk) 01:28, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Question

Hi. If you don't mind me asking, who's your favorite Doctor? --Adamant1 (talk) 16:21, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Peter Capaldi- Twelfth Doctor. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 18:21, 30 August 2025 (UTC)

Capaldi's good. I'm a big Tom Baker fan myself. I stopped watching the new series halfway through David Tennant's run though. So I never really watched Capaldi.

Random side thing, and why I'm replying to this 5 days later, but I'm going through a similar situation to what you mentioned on the proposal page with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Maximum cards of India. Some of the images are clearly copyrighted, but the DR was closed as keep by Abzeronow because supposedly they predate 1958. Even though at least some of them clearly don't. I then asked him to reconsider it on his talk page, which he wasn't willing to do. So I renominated the images for deletion. Leading to Krd closing the second DR as keep because he didn't think the first discussion was worth overriding. Even though there was clear agreement in the second discussion, including by Abzeronow, that some of the images are copyrighted. So now I have to grovel to Krd to reconsider his close. Renominate the images for deletion yet again for a third time if he won't, probably just to have yet another administrator close it as keep "per prior discussions" or some nonsense Etc. Etc. The whole thing is a massive dumpster fire. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:37, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Tom Baker's cool too. Yeah, RTD can be an acquired taste at times, so makes sense you might have left halfway through.

Yeah- probably all of them are copyrighted in the US- given US copyright laws- no offense, but things became much more clear after thinking of it independently, as your nomination statement was kind of a dumpster fire. I would recommend searching the dates for them, waiting some time, and nomming again based on US copyright only. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 15:46, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

I looked into the photographs before nominating them for deletion and there aren't exact publication dates from what I could find. At least in my experience it's nearly impossible to have an image deleted on here purely because of US copyright, unless it was originally published there. But a lack of clear original publication date should have been enough to justify deletion based on the PCP anyway. Per Commons:Hirtle chart the copyright term for unpublished anonymous and pseudonymous works, and works made for hire (corporate authorship) is 120 years from the creation date. So either they are copyrighted because of first being published after 1958 or are copyrighted due to not being published. I don't know. I don't care, but the process to appeal bad closes needs to be changed anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Well, we were able to find dates for atleast three of them. And if US copyright isn't enough for deletion, then the files won't be an issue, because they almost definitely are pre-1964 images.

Though yeah, the process has got to change. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Re Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by BellaOfc

Hi! In the future, please don't embed a speedy deletion template in a regular DR. You can either just tag the file for speedy deletion, or just type out "CSD F10 or G10" in a regular DR without putting it in a template, but having templates inside templates causes weird issues. Thanks! The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

PS, I fixed the issue with the tl template. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:55, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Okay. Sorry, I didn't know- I have done so before (and seen other people do it), and never seen any issues- I'll do as you say and do it without the template from now on. Thank you! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:57, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Poulithra coast.jpg

Hello. To see where this picture was taken from: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Poulithra_coast.jpg

Go to google maps and find location 36.6858812,23.0483429 then watch the street view. It is around that spot. This is Monemvasia, not Poulithra. Αρκάς (talk) 09:47, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

I did- I still think they are very different looking with only superficial similarities. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 14:20, 4 September 2025 (UTC)

Just an elaboration I didn't get to post

Regarding your ANI report[2] I just wanted to elaborate on what made the report problematic:

• Abzeronow's closing argument was that it is in scope because they illustrate concepts with Unicode. Categorization needs tightening up because some categories violate principle of least surprise. - the first part is a matter of fact — there's Unicode illustrated in the image. The second part actually acknowledges that there's still an issue that needs to be addressed.
• You asked at first In what way does emojis on naked women illustrate emojis/unicode? This question is easy to answer, because there is, objectively speaking, in fact an illustration of Unicode in that image. That's just a fact. One may disagree with the way that the Unicode is illustrated, but one simply cannot argue that there is an illustration of Unicode in that image, so Abzeronow observation in the closing comment is correct "they illustrate concepts with Unicode". By asking about the women part you are making the question about something that was not actually part of Abzeronow's closing rationale, so the question can appear loaded because you are asking Abzeronow to explain something that they didn't actually say.
• Your second attempt of asking was I want an answer- what the fuck made you say a bunch of unicode on a naked women is illustrating the concept well. First of all, there's an issue with your tone that makes things appear very loaded at this point. Second of all, you're again asking them to explain a comment that they didn't make, because nowhere did Abzeronow say that his closing rationale had anything to do with women, nor did they ever claim that the image is "illustrating the concept well", they only said that it does illustrate the concept (which is objectively true), and, in fact Abzeronow acknowledged that the way that the concept is being illustrated is rather problematic than "well"; that's what the second part of their closing comment was about.

You are not doing yourself a favor with this report. And it's probably also counterproductive for the cause of righting great wrongs regarding the objectification of women. I mean, I'm also not a fan of Panteleev's work (and how it appears in categories where you don't expect to see naked women), however, it's still impossible for me to argue that the image in question is illustrating Unicode, but that's what you did in your request to Abzeronow to explain themselves. Nakonana (talk) 09:30, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

Note, the present tense in You are not doing yourself a favor with this report. is an artifact of me writing the above while the report was still open. Nakonana (talk) 09:35, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

• No, that part of the sentence is different- the scope part comes from the circular reasoning that it is in scope, because it is in scope
• But that's not the same thing- like take my analogy of air, or the fact that we delete images of faces and dicks using F10- they also illustrate things? You can also look at Abzeronow's close of any other DRs- the fact that some concept is illustrated is not brought up, only a good explanation of concepts is sometimes brought up.
• See above

Again, saying something illustrates something on Commons in a DR or any such place always means it illustrates it to a sufficient degree, because everything can always illustrate something. I would understand that perhaps he used the phrase incorrectly(one can't always be in "Commons mode"), but he should atleast explain- it's not good for an admin to keep a sentence which can be constructed as misogynstic so easily unchanged and not even explain it. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:50, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

We do accept a lot of suboptimal illustrations for one reason or the other. Panteleev's work could easily pass as "Unicode in art" for which we don't even seem to have a category for so that Panteleev's works might be the only illustrations we have of "Unicode in art" and that is usually a common reason to retain illustrations even if they are not ideal representations. I think Abzeronow was really just trying to avoid to make his closing rationale about anything that makes Panteleev's work so controversial or to get into yet another debate about the controversialness of Panteleev's work. Nakonana (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

As in, I don't think that Abzeronow made that comment in bad faith. Nakonana (talk) 10:01, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

It really can't- there is illustrations of unicode on Commons. That wouldn't make sense- as saying they are in scope is the controversial part, which he repeated in all Exey related closes- so that's not a way to avoid controversy. May Abzeronow didn't make it in bad faith, but I asked him twice to explain it- the right thing to do would be to explain it. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:08, 7 September 2025 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 2 weeks

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 2 weeks for the following reason: Escalating pattern of disruption across several discussions related to Exey Panteleev, personal attacks, and disrupting a DR to make a point. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:54, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

Unblock

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Targeted and involved block by TSC, even the blocking statement includes misrepresentations. I know I'm supposed to give reasons for my behaviour, and apologise for any actions- but given that TSC's block is involved and targeted (and contrary to policy), I'll describe my non-block worthy behavior to non-involved admins, and apologise for my non-block worthy actions to non-involved admins. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 21:05, 10 September 2025 (UTC)" Decline reason: "Hi @DoctorWhoFan91 and thanks for the ping. While at times, one gets too much involved in anything that it becomes too hard to cool (please read en:WP:COAL, which I usually see as a great piece of advise. I haven't read entirety of your previous communications with other contributors and admins (and it would take my enough time (tldr), and I am unfortunately not having it). Your presumed understanding of Abzernow's closure comment in itself is anti-policy as several others told you but as I said elsewhere I am myself not really interested in DRs of that kind. The ANU thread was unwarranted even though you later quickly dropped it. Just because someone didn't respond to your query, doesn't make it ANU-worthy. The second, you need to rework on how you put forth your arguments. My intuition says you need some time to stay cool, take your time off, enjoy real life activities. At least nothing should be "presumably" taken too much personal that it comes as shooting our own foot. For example, on moral grounds I'd say we should delete all images in which people are naked (even if its partially) but Commons is not censored, so it won't happen - and I need to learn to take stay coolly. I will reduce the duration of the block so that you take this time off to eventually learn staying cool. Blocks aren't punitive but if you do not understand the reasons of your block and bring satsuma instead of the ball in your next argument, I might be in favor of having your talk-page access revoked for a week. Enjoy this time off and stay cool! signed, Aafi (talk) 08:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

@Aafi(sorry to ping you), who I know will be neutral and just focus on the behaviour of people involved, as I saw in a separate discussion. @Taivo who usually handles unblock requests, and would also be neutral as far as I can see. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:11, 11 September 2025 (UTC)|

User:Aafi As I said before, it wasn't about the close of the DR- Abzeronow seemingly violated UCoC, and didn't bother to explain why. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:20, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

This is once again satsuma that doesn't belong here. You're accusing someone what they never did. This is casting an aspersion, and a presumable understanding of you only. You need to assume good faith towards others on the community. ─ Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 09:36, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

But he did do it- I assumed good faith and asked him twice why he had chosen to go with something that could be constructed as misogynistic- and he didn't answer, nor change his remark to make it seem less misogynistic. By policy, we are supposed to find avenues for dispute resolution, and AN is the dispute resolution space. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:40, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

The default is that you assume good faith and don't assume a negative thought with a comment from someone, unless it isn't 100% apparently abusive. That said, even when you were told that the conversation was rather loaded, you were supposed to drop the stick of your presumed negative meaning of something that inherently wasn't wrong either. I really advice you drop the stick here. If you continue escalating this unwarranted closure comment and accuse others of misogyny, you might end up loosing your access to this talk page as well. I reduced your block duration to a week not to hear the same unwarranted arguments but to help you be cool. Which at the point lies in your dropping all these unwarranted sticks of either accusing others of misogyny or casting aspersions without a valid and legit reason to do so. If you do not understand the reason of your block and do not commit to avoiding such a behaviour afterwards, you will do yourself a favor of getting blocked for a longer period of time only. Drop the stick here! ─ Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 10:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

I didn't assume- I asked why, twice, and then asked again. It's loaded because TSC tried to associate it with an issue where two separate admins decided to misuse their admin privileges(you yourself said the solution to that problem was re-DRing, so I don't see why you can't see a misuse of admin privileges).

I'm not accusing Abzeronow of misogyny, I'm asking him to explain/change his comment. I'm cool- I'm not the one choosing to misrepresent things to make discussions per policy seem like ramblings of a madwoman.

What is the reason of my block, User:AafiOnMobile- I can very clearly show that the reasons given for my block were false- I have cooled off the matter, given that I mostly didn't comment on Exey on Village Pump the last few days. Line-crossing statements were made by user Dronebogus, TSC is counting me guilty by association. I have made no statements that another user (namely, IagoQnsi, or TSC himself) hasn't made- TSC has chosen to misrepresent things as a way to misuse his admin powers to force discussion on the matter. You said you do not have the time to go through a lot of the discussions, so I don't see how you are so sure I escalated anything.

User:Abzeronow did make a seemingly misogynistic statement, and refused to give an explanation. Given that an admin decided to threaten a block while being involved, and tried to associate with a matter that has lots of admins involved- I would go to Meta-Wiki if admins here think I should have been threatened with a block for dispute resolution per policy against an admin bending policy. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:24, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

You tell me, if you saw something that might be breaking policy- would you not try to ask the person doing it if that is what he was doing/ what it was that he was doing? And explanations/suggestions on how he could avoid such things in the future? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:27, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

As a way to show I have no sticks picked up- you can tban me from any Exey related discussions, or any nudity related discussions too- you can indef me if I !vote there or at the village pump/AN/anywhere, User:Aafi (or even User:Jmabel (sorry to ping)- who can attest that I do listen to admins and drop sticks when it's per policy and not admin priveledge misuse.) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:46, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Threatened of a block? Warning is different than a threat. There was no dispute in place. It was rather a misinterpretation from your side, and Abzeronow didn't want to get into a loaded conversation. So you just stop there. ANU was a waste of time. I'd really advise that:

1. You understand you where blocked for a "reason". That's excessively and unncessarily escalating discussions and wasting time of other editors.
2. You commit to not doing this again.

Once that's sorted, all is well. You can't keep on casting bad aspersions just because you feel someone's comment was misogynistic and they didn't give you an explanation. Ideally because it wasn't misogynistic, and the query didn't merit a response. You could just keep yourself limited to areas in which you like to contribute (uploading, improving and else). Does that work? _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 15:13, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

No, threatened(to paraphrase, TSC said that he was involved so he couldn't, but he wishes someone would boomerang block me). It wasn't a misinterpretation- Abzeronow said ambiguous stuff and didn't bother fixing/clarifying it, and hence ANU was not a waste of time.

1) The reason being some admins would rather misuse their powers rather than have a conversation/ follow policy? Again, ask Jmabel, I stopped in a different area, because his words were actually according to policy.

2)I just said just tban me from nudity related DRs if you want.

It's not an aspersion if he did do it(namely making a statement that can be seen as misogynistic). What are your reasons for why it can't be seen as misogynistic- you are not a woman, and per your own statement("on moral grounds I'd say we should delete all images in which people are naked (even if its partially)") you don't seen to be able to see why a statement regarding naked women might be seen as misogynstic?

Like this is a serious question- none of you(you, Abzeronow, Rosenzweig) are women, none of you have faced misogyny- how are any of you saying a statement can't be seen as misogynistic with absolute certainty? I didn't even say the statement was certainly misogynistic, as you're implying- I said it could be seen as misogynistic, which does create a non-healthy environment for women who see said comment- and hence a clarification/modification would be helpful, which is the point of the UCoC- a non-discriminatory space for all on WM projects.

Check my edits, I was editing in other spaces- TSC blocked me because he sees being asked to support his statements as "taunts". Also, might I remind you, you're the one who said re-nom files if you think they were closed against policy, and TSC is the one closed it again, also against policy. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Like, it's simple- ask Abzeronow to modify "these are in scope images, they illustrate concepts with Unicode. Categorization needs tightening up because some categories violate principle of least surprise." to "these are in scope images. Categorization needs tightening up because some categories violate principle of least surprise." That's all I asked, not a reopen of the DR, not a changing of his view, just a modification of his statement, User:Aafi.(He can modify it any way he likes, as long as the most common interpretation of it by someone who does experience misogyny isn't that it's misogynstic).

I also think there have been anti-policy closes of many DRs, but I won't argue about them if it's not necessary- just unblock me as status quo ante bellum; keep me blocked, and I will explain to a neutral place like meta-wiki how many ways admins like TSC were breaking Commons policy. I'm not even gonna touch Exey or any nudity related DRs and discussions, I have seen what happens, and I do not care about them enough. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Your comments show that the block was fully justified and maybe even to short. They way how you discuss is purely disruptive and nothing we can accept on Commons. If you want to contribute to this project please accept the two week block and change the way how you formulate comments or do as you pledged: stay away from the topic. GPSLeo (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Explain how my comments are disruptive? No one has said a shred of unanswerable evidence against me, yet I have constantly described how said admins have misused admin powers. If you refer to the meta-wiki comment- then I'm in fact following policy- try to sort stuff out- if it doesn't work, try ANU, if admins do not perform their duties, go to ArbCom- we have no arbcom, so go to the U4C. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 17:06, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Do you mean "and" instead of "or" in the last sentence? Because I plan to stay away from Exey no matter what happens here. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 17:15, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

I see you might find yourself seemingly alone in this because your presumable interpretations have not been approved of by the community members at different avenues, and instead of dropping the stick here, and to rather improve your talking behaviour, you have been just digging the hole for no good reason: except to interpret someone's statement in your own way that it actually hasn't been so. Your responses lack an understanding of basic competence, and given that you haven't really paid any heed to the advise shared, I will change your block duration to a month and also revoke email & talk-page access. You cannot help yourself by putting in irrelevant long threads and wasting community time. Enjoy your time off! _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 17:42, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Responses to questions at ANU thread

About the ANU thread that has been started, given that I'm blocked, I shall by replying here to any questions asked prompted, and any egregious stuff said about me even unprompted. Note that dispute resolution says that if the other user(namely, Abzeronow) does not engage to deflate a conflict (namely, the fact that a statement of his can be constructed as misogynistic), one can escalate it to other avenues(such as ANU)- it was contrary to policy, as TSC suggested, to block me for it, because he for some reason believes that it's about getting a closed DR open. Note also that my "taunts" at the DR are about his vocalisation of a boomerang block at me for asking a clarification from Abzeronow- where else am I supposed to ask questions but DRs if TSC thinks simple acts of clarification threaten a ban, and Rosenzweig thinks it's nonsense that I think an ambiguously misogynstic statement is misogynistic. These "taunts" can't be considered fine when said by one person, but taunts when said by another person. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 21:14, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

To dronebogus- are you trying to say you can read my mind, by implying my vote was dishonest? I oppose the assumed scope of those photos- and I said that I have decided not to go against the consensus forming in the discussion- and hence in that case, my vote is infact keep- you're the one who opposes them to a degree that you were attacking users disagreeing with you.

You say you would have blocked me if you were an admin- but one, you would be involved, and two- you were blocked twice for attacking a user about those files(also vice versa, he was also blocked, let's not omit things), so I don't see how what you would do is a valid viewpoint one should talk- I can provide evidence of Drone's attacking of people at VP/P if any admins wants, btw.

Addition-

You do have a futa userbox and other fetishistic stuff on your userpage, Drone- and you do want to delete the Exey files while keeping your own lower quality files based on vibes instead of policy - combining this with similar comments and stuff by users in th se discussions(again, I can provide diffs later), one can't see how one doesn't come to the conclusion that a lot of the users voting are "horny men".DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 21:45, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

I just complained about your ad hominem attacks at ANU, and now you’re making them here. Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

which part of the original comment was ad-hominem? Because all I said is your opinion wouldn't be valid because you too would be involved to a massive degree in two separate ways. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 21:54, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

You're supposed to notify me, TSC, when posting at ANU btw. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 21:18, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

I'm going to sleep, I hope you would have done the formality of notifying me by the time I'm awake. Note to other admins- please do not close that thread before I'm awake- give me the chance to respond to the questions and statement that would be said under that thread. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 22:10, 10 September 2025 (UTC)

User:The Squirrel Conspiracy still no notification- you are supposed to, even when one finds it on her own. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 05:49, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

@admins am I disrupting a DR by saying the same stuff that User:IagoQnsi said? User:Bedivere says good block, but can one believe they are uninvolved, when they decide to close a half day old DR, contrary to policy, which states DRs should be kept open for around 7 days if the DR is not a clear SD? DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 05:57, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Dispute resolution text

• Talk to the user directly. Use talk pages, be civil, polite and assume good faith if possible.
• Consider asking other users for advice (not intervention) on how to handle the dispute.
• Try to find creative solutions or compromises that can satisfy everyone. Make sure you understand Commons' policies and guidelines yourself, and consider whether the other person may be right.

• If necessary go to Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems.
• If it's a substantial content issue that has a wider impact, consider Commons:Village pump (or other language equivalents) to settle the content issue (unless a deletion request or category discussion would be more appropriate).

• Tried step 1, Abzeronow refused to engage.
• As an alternative to step 2 and 3, as they don't fix fully, tried step 1 again.
• Tried step 4, was threatened with a block by a very involved admin. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 10:52, 11 September 2025 (UTC)